Application registered
Consultation
period
Application under consideration
Decision
made
Description
Two storey rear extension.
Location
6A Newtown Gardens Henley-on-Thames RG9 1EH
Grid Reference
476445/181647
Applicant
Mr I Hargreaves
6A Newtown Gardens
HENLEY-ON-THAMES
RG9 1EH
Agent
Mr Roger Palmer
49 Galsworthy Drive
Caversham
READING
RG4 6PR
Consultation / Notification
No further Representations on this application will be accepted.
Consultations / Notifications to date are shown below.
Name / Number
Date Sent
Response Date
c/o Miss J Samuels
Council Offices
Town Hall
Market Place
HENLEY-ON-THAMES
RG9 2AQ
28 04 2008
6 Newtown Gardens
HENLEY-ON-THAMES
Oxon
rg91eh
16 04 2008
7 Newtown Gardens
HENLEY-ON-THAMES
Oxon
RG9 1EH
18 04 2008
28 Wilson Avenue
HENLEY-ON-THAMES
Oxon
RG9 1ET
30 Wilson Avenue
HENLEY-ON-THAMES
Oxon
RG9 1ET
32 Wilson Avenue
HENLEY-ON-THAMES
Oxon
RG9 1ET
18 04 2008
The Henley Society (Planning)
24 04 2008
Room 3/15
Temple Quay House
2 The Square
Temple Quay
Bristol
BS1 6PN
Application Progress
Date Received
1st February 2008
Registration Date
2nd April 2008
Start Consultation Period
2nd April 2008
End Consultation Period
30th April 2008
Target Decision Date
28th May 2008
Decision
Refusal of Planning Permission on 27th May 2008
Conditions / Refusal Reasons
The proposals are contrary to policies G6, D4 and H13 of the adopted South Oxfordshire Local Plan 2011, and to advice contained in the South Oxfordshire Design Guide 2000. Having regard to the location of the dwelling in close proximity to adjoining properties, and having regard to the pitched roof form of the extension proposed, the proposals would result in an overbearing and unneighbourly form of development by reason of overlooking, intrusion and loss of light that would detract from the residential amenity currently enjoyed by the occupants of the adjoining residential properties.
The proposals would be contrary to policies G6 and H13 of the adopted South Oxfordshire Local Plan 2011 and to advice contained in the South Oxfordshire Design Guide 2000. Having regard to the size of the extension proposed, the proposal would leave inadequate amenity space to serve the enlarged property, detrimental to the residential amenity of the occupiers of the extended dwelling, and accordingly would represent a cramped overdevelopment of the site.
Appeal
Appeal Allowed on 29 October 2008
Updates
These Planning
Application Details were returned live from our back office database,
and as such are as up to date as when the page was retrieved.
(Show Map - opens in new window)
